ABSTRACT
Since February 2020, hundreds of thousands of patients have been left with persistant symptoms after their infection. Along with their clinicians, these patients are exposed to a high degree of uncertainty and the urgent need to produce conceptual frameworks aimed at recognising, treating and validating their experience as patients suffering from new and protracted symptoms and witnessing debates as to how these symptoms should be qualified. In this respect, long covid illustrates the need to combine the collective experiential knowledge of patients and scientific knowledge for the benefit of the patients, clinicians and research.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , COVID-19/complications , Humans , Knowledge , Patient Outcome Assessment , SARS-CoV-2 , Post-Acute COVID-19 SyndromeABSTRACT
Confinement within the framework of Covid 19 required organizations in cancer centers, in particular with postponing certain treatments. We interviewed 6080 patients who had a scheduled appointment during this period. 2478 patients gave their opinion regarding access and organization of care, teleconsultation, their concerns and their reasons for satisfaction. While 83 % of them say they are satisfied with the organization of care, 25 % of respondents say they have given up care that they consider essential in 1/3 of cases. The concern related to the follow-up of the cancerous disease takes precedence over that of being infected with the Sars-cov-2 virus, unlike the general population, and relationships with their loved ones are spontaneously cited as a reason for satisfaction. This method captures the experience of patients, despite certain limitations. Such an approach could be used to set up a specific system during normal periods.